Sustainable Jersey: Never underestimate the power of a small grant

Posted on by Donna Drewes, Co-Director, Sustainable Jersey


C.J. Davenport and West Cape May elementary schools inspire us

 Through Sustainable Jersey for Schools, we’ve gotten to know some amazing changemakers, ranging from teachers and principals to parents and students to district administrators – all with a true passion for what they do. Their stories inspire us.

We’ve also realized that grants are a spark that can make incredible things happen. For many grant recipients, the grant they were awarded was a launching pad to something bigger. The stories are different, but each is important. Here are the experiences of two schools, each of which has achieved Sustainable Jersey for Schools certification and recently received a Sustainable Jersey for Schools grant.

Beeline to Breakfast at C.J. Davenport Elementary

As many parents can attest, it’s not easy to get kids, up, dressed, fed and to school on time. Yet, eating a healthy breakfast is critical. So, led by Ellen Gregory, the director of development for Egg Harbor Township School District, the Davenport Breakfast After the Bell pilot 2C.J. Davenport Elementary School Complex looked for a grant to fund a pilot program to address this need. The school applied for a $2,000 Sustainable Jersey for Schools grant, funded by the New Jersey Education Association (NJEA), to provide healthy bagged breakfasts to students.

After the grant was awarded, more than 7,400 bagged breakfasts were served through the pilot program that lasted from January to mid-June 2016. With a focus on ease and efficiency, bagged breakfasts were provided every morning to first-grade students of C.J. Davenport Elementary School as they exited school buses. The students took the bags to the classroom to be eaten during morning preparations.

The small grant has made a big impact. The continued success of the program at C.J. Davenport Elementary has spurred expansion to other schools in the district. A similar grab-and-go bagged breakfast program was implemented last year at Alder Avenue Middle School and offered to the entire population of nearly 900 students. This year, the program was expanded to E.H. Slaybaugh Elementary School, E.H. Slaybaugh Primary School and also to 6th graders at Fernwood Avenue Middle School.

The teachers report that the students are more engaged since the Beeline to Breakfast pilot program was implemented.

“There are over forty key nutrients children need for healthy development, and those who skip breakfast have little hope of getting them later in the day,” said Kevin Fricke, the former principal of C.J. Davenport Elementary School Complex. “On top of that when a student is hungry all morning, their mind is often anywhere but focused on lessons. We believe that bringing breakfast into the classroom creates the best opportunity for turning that situation around. We will also continue teaching students about the importance of eating a healthy breakfast every day.”

Kevin Fricke is now principal at E.H. Slaybaugh Elementary School Complex.

A Greenhouse at West Cape May Elementary

It’s a shame that gardening and all of the important lessons associated with digging in the dirt have to be limited to warm months. This leaves little time for schools to involve students in gardening.

greenhousecapemayIn West Cape May, parent Dr. Inga La Puma, a biologist, spearheaded an effort to apply for a Sustainable Jersey for Schools grant funded by NJEA. The West Cape May Elementary School wanted to expand their modest school garden program by creating a winter greenhouse space that could also serve as an outdoor classroom.

The school applied for and was awarded a $10,000 Sustainable Jersey for Schools grant. Thanks to a group of volunteers, the greenhouse was built and officially opened this month to an appreciative school and community. Bob Shepanski, a local contractor, donated his time to the project and parent Mike Lanzone, who had building expertise, supervised.  Forty volunteers helped raise the greenhouse frame and then came back to do the smaller jobs of getting the greenhouse ready.

Now growing and caring for plants in the greenhouse will provide room to expand the science, math, art and nutrition curricula and provide a connection to the agricultural heritage of West Cape May. The grant will also provide for the use of the foods grown in the greenhouse to promote a Farm to School lunch program. Students will be exposed to healthy eating habits that they will take home and parents will benefit by coming together for a joint community and school effort.

Although the district was unsuccessful in its first attempt at a federal Farm to School Planning grant, Dr. La Puma and the green team are hoping to secure a future grant to implement a farm to school program that will improve access to local foods. What started out as a request to improve the lunch offerings, has blossomed into a green team, teachers trained to infuse sustainability into their curricula and collaboration with neighboring school districts to spark the Farm to School movement.

“Although West Cape May Elementary School only has 95 students, our remarkable parent, staff and student participation and support made this possible,” Superintendent Dr. Alfred Savio said. “We hope that the students and families will be positively impacted by this project. Each grade will have a project, with the fifth and sixth-graders taking on the effort to start their own business selling plants, herbs and vegetables. They will develop a business plan and budget and sell shares in the business to raise money for supplies. This grant has served to energize our school sustainability work.”

For more about Sustainable Jersey for Schools: Website  Facebook  Twitter  Instagram   LinkedIn

Posted in Education, Environment, Green Ideas, Sustainable Jersey | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Pro Bono Partnership Pundit: Does Your Organization Meet the Public Support Test? 

Posted on by Pro Bono Partnership

CashStrings CC Tax Credits

Where Funding Comes From Matters

Your nonprofit is pretty new and still small. It’s been operating on about $5,000 a year. Now a funder wants to give you a grant for $20,000. Or, it’s a mature charity, but an offer of unusually large support arrives from one wealthy individual.

Great, right? Of course we’ll take it! Time to slow down and think about what it means to be a 501(c)(3) “public charity,” and what impact your funding sources may have on that status.

Failure to meet the Public Support test over a five-year period may result in reclassification of the organization as a private foundation, so it’s important to keep this issue in mind and discuss significant funding opportunities with your accountant before accepting them.

If you retain a professional to help prepare your annual Form 990, they will likely raise these issues, but you should be aware of the funding percentages before the point of preparing the 990. (This is not the most exciting stuff, but it’s important to maintain public charity status — so bear with me.)

The IRS required you to demonstrate in your organization’s application for tax-exemption that it would meet one of the public support standards. This is why the IRS asked your nonprofit to estimate how much money you’d be raising and from what types of sources.

Which set of standards applies to your organization depends on where you expected to get most of your funding at the time you applied. Do you know whether your organization is tax-exempt under Internal Revenue Code section 509(a)(1) or 509(a)(2)? That information is specified in your Determination Letter from the IRS — the one that confirmed that the nonprofit qualified for federal tax-exempt status.

If your Determination Letter states that your organization qualifies under 509(a)(1), then your nonprofit is subject to a requirement that it receive at least one-third of its support from contributions from the general public, or meet the 10 percent “facts and circumstances” test. Public support generally includes funding from governmental agencies and contributions or grants from the public and/or other public charities. Grants from other single sources, such as private foundations or individuals, count towards public support, but only up to 2 percent of the organization’s total support. Note that the percentage is calculated using a five-year period.

For example, if an organization’s total support over the five-year period is $2 million, including $200,000 of total contributions from one foundation, the amount of that foundation’s contributions that can be included as public support is limited to 2 percent of $2 million, or $40,000.  Because $40,000 is only 2 percent of $2 million, the organization would need another $626,666 of public support (from government grants, individual contributions, etc.) to meet the 1/3 test.

Instead, the alternative “facts and circumstances” test for a 509(a)(1) organization is met if the nonprofit has a public support ratio of 10 percent or more; the organization is organized and operated so as to attract new and additional public or governmental support; and the facts and circumstances indicate it is a publicly supported organization. The “facts and circumstances” are analyzed using the “Five Factor Analysis,” which includes analysis of sources of support, corporate structure and governance, and programs and services.

Section 509(a)(2) organizations are those that generally receive more than one-third of their support from contributions from the general public and/or from gross receipts from activities related to their tax-exempt purposes, and no more than one-third from gross investment income and unrelated business taxable income. Examples of a 509(a)(2) might include theaters or schools that receive most of their support from ticket sales or tuition payments.

The takeaway is that you don’t need to be an expert in nonprofit accounting, but you do need to keep in mind that new or potential funding sources must be evaluated in light of your organization’s total support.

Failure to pay attention to relative percentages of funding sources has led many nonprofits into private foundation status — escape from which requires several years of effort! If a particularly large gift or grant is being considered, or there are any doubts about meeting the public support test, you should contact the nonprofit’s accountant or another financial professional familiar with public charities.

For more information and examples, please see the following articles:

Do you have a question you’d like to us to address? Leave it in the comments below.

20160108_Nancy_025cNancy Eberhardt is New Jersey director of Pro Bono Partnership and a regular contributor to the Dodge Blog. Pro Bono Partnership provides free business and transactional legal services to nonprofits serving the disadvantaged or enhancing the quality of life in neighborhoods in New York, New Jersey and Connecticut. Learn more here

Posted in Nonprofit, Pro Bono Partnership, Technical Assistance | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

ArtPride New Jersey: Now is the Time

Posted on by Ann Marie Miller, ArtPride NJ

March CC Wendy Harmon


“Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country.”

It’s the (early) 70’s and that was the warm up drill in Mrs. Lester’s typing class where I learned to type over 100 words per minute. Today, of course, it would be “all good men and women.”

2016AADThat phrase keeps echoing in my brain as 2017 shepherds in political turmoil accompanied by tense but much-needed discourse. The pervasive undercurrent, in many instances, is a rediscovered energy to “come to the aid of our country.” The day before the inauguration, arts advocates heard an early call. An article in The Hill said that transition team advisors to the President are calling for the elimination of the National Endowment for the Arts and the National Endowment for the Humanities, and privatizing the Corporation for Public Broadcasting.

To this day, there has been no official White House confirmation of this plan. The Hill article is about two transition team members who put together suggestions for the FY2018 Trump budget proposal. Both of these individuals worked for the Heritage Foundation, which has been calling for the NEA to be shut down since 1997. It’s not clear if their suggestions will be incorporated into a Trump budget proposal to Congress.

That being said, The Hill article was enough to mobilize grassroots arts advocates around the nation. Can advocates prevent this from happening? If so, what can you do and what should you do to preserve federal funding for arts and culture until the budget is released in early March?

Here are three quick things you can do now.

  1. Make sure you sign the Arts Action Fund petition and invite friends to do the same. This action helps arts advocates organize, and Americans for the Arts CEO Bob Lynch plans to present this Arts Action Fund petition to the President (you may have seen other petitions, but THIS is the one to sign).
  2. If you do not currently receive action alerts from ArtPride NJ, complete the quick sign up at ArtPride NJ’s Arts Action Center.
  3. Join the New Jersey delegation to Washington, D.C. for National Arts Advocacy Day on March 20-21. Register now and inform ArtPride NJ that you plan to attend. March 20 is filled with advocacy training before visits to all New Jersey congressional offices on March 21.

Arts Pride New Jersey from Dante Giannetta on Vimeo.

New Jersey is fortunate to have members of U.S. Congress who support federal funding for the arts, humanities, and public broadcasting.

However, it is our job as citizens and advocates to remind them how federal funding affects our state. The ArtPride online NEA toolkit has information on how each year nearly $2 million from the NEA makes a big difference to the quality of life in New Jersey.

Lastly, the National Endowment for the Humanities and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting are sister agencies to the NEA. The NJ Council for the Humanities is fully funded by federal dollars and depends on that support for its very existence as they provide programs and grants that deepen our understanding of ourselves and our world.

WBGO-FM and NJTV receive funds from CPB to support diverse programs and services that inform, educate, enlighten and enrich the public — an invaluable service that deserves the support of all good men and women.

Stay informed, learn more about how government operates and set time aside for strategic civic action.

For more information on how to be an active and well-informed arts advocate, do not hesitate to reach out to ArtPride NJ for resources, guidance, real facts and tools to help you, as a citizen, “come to the aid of our country.”



Ann Marie Miller is the Director of Advocacy and Public Policy at ArtPride New Jersey and a regular contributor to the Dodge Blog. Email her at Click here to visit ArtPride’s website.

Photo at top: Creative Commons / Wendy Harmon



Posted in Advocacy, ArtPride New Jersey, Arts, Arts Advocacy, Community Building, Informed Communities, Nonprofit, Public Policy | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Don’t Weaken the Existing Ban on Electioneering by 501(c)(3) Organizations

Posted on by Guest Blogger
Proposed ‘Johnson Amendment’ repeal would harm nonprofit organizations
white house

Since 1954, tax law has contained a provision prohibiting 501(c)(3) nonprofit organizations from directly or indirectly attempting to influence the election or defeat of any candidate for public office. This ban, also known as the Johnson Amendment for its sponsor, then-Senator Lyndon B. Johnson, applies not only to churches but to all nonprofit organizations.

During this year’s National Prayer Breakfast, President Trump renewed his call for a repeal of the 62-year-old ban, and several different bills have been introduced in Congress to weaken or completely repeal it. The Center for Non-Profits strongly opposes repeal and supports preserving the current law.

The current ban provides an important buffer between partisan politics and charitable or philanthropic works. A hallmark of the charitable community is its ability to unify stakeholders and tackle important problems without regard to partisan labels. As the National Council of Nonprofits has pointed out, if the Johnson Amendment is repealed, charities risk becoming identified more with a specific political party and less as the problem-solvers they are.

Repeal would all but guarantee the infusion of “dark money” into charitable work and would undermine public trust in the integrity of charitable organizations.Dark money” refers to the use of non-charitable entities such as 501(c)(4), 501(c)(6), and other vehicles, for political contributions without the legal requirement to disclose the source of these donations. Under the existing law, 501(c)(3) organizations are barred from accepting or using funds for partisan political purposes (this is often a source of confusion among policymakers, press and the public who are unaware of the clear differences between 501(c)(3) organizations and non-charitable non-profits).

If the Johnson Amendment is repealed, donors could turn charitable organizations into conduits to funnel contributions to political candidates and campaigns – and these contributions would be tax-deductible. Charities and foundations would also become vulnerable to untoward political pressures – for endorsements, campaign contributions, and other kinds of support – that would effectively divert scarce resources from public benefit missions to partisan political purposes.

Donor privacy could be at risk. In the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court’s Citizens United ruling and the proliferation of political organizations such as 501(c)(4) entities, 527 political action committees and others, efforts have been mounting at the national and state levels to shine a bright light on money in politics by requiring identification of political donors. Donor privacy has long been considered sacrosanct in the charitable world, and precisely because of the existing ban on electioneering, there is a strong rationale for excluding 501(c)(3) organizations from the donor disclosure requirements targeted at political organizations and activities. If the Johnson Amendment were weakened or repealed, the distinction between 501(c)(3) organizations and political organizations would become effectively meaningless, and donor privacy harder to protect.

Non-profit leaders can already speak out in their individual capacities. Proponents of repeal argue that it is needed on free speech grounds in order to allow religious leaders to express views about candidates and campaigns. But religious leaders, like any individual associated with a charity, are always free to make public statements endorsing or opposing candidates in elections – as long as they do so as individuals and not on behalf or in representation of the institution or with use of its resources. And current law already permits 501(c)(3) public charities (including houses of worship) and their representatives to engage in issue advocacy, limited lobbying, and voter engagement, all on a nonpartisan basis.

Non-profit advocacy is a critical part of public discourse and sound public policy. The current, longstanding ban on electioneering helps to preserve the integrity of, and trust in, charities and foundations, and also shields them from untoward pressures that could undermine their independent advocacy voice. Individuals who wish to endorse candidates should do so in their individual capacities, and organizations that wish to become involved in partisan politics should use one of the other vehicles, such as 501(c)(4), Section 527, or other non-charitable structures available for this purpose. Repealing the Johnson Amendment would cause incalculable damage to charitable and philanthropic organizations and to the public causes we serve. The current law should be preserved.

For more information about how you can help to preserve the nonpartisanship of our nation’s charitable and philanthropic organizations, contact us at the Center.


Linda M. Czipo is President & CEO of the Center for Non-Profits, New Jersey’s statewide umbrella organization for the charitable community. Through advocacy, public education, technical assistance and cost-saving member services, the Center works to build the power of New Jersey’s non-profit community to improve the quality of life for the people of our state. 


Posted in Nonprofit, Public Policy | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Pro Bono Partnership Pundit: Seven Simple Suggestions for Making Your Lawyer Happy (cont.)

Posted on by Pro Bono Partnership

Creative Commons Billy Brown

Last month, I offered you the first four of my seven tips for making a lawyer happy. Here are the final three.

Five: If You Want to Schedule a Call, Please Suggest Some Days and Time.  Some nonprofits will drop me an e-mail to ask, “Do you have time for a call?

It would have been helpful had the correspondent set forth what the topic is about, how urgent the matter is, and, most importantly, a few different days and times when the inquirer would be available for the call.

And please don’t say you are available “anytime” or “all day on Thursday,” when in fact you don’t normally arrive at work until 10 a.m. or you typically leave at 2 p.m. It would be more efficient to say, “I’m available on Tuesday, from 8:30 to 3:30, or on Wednesday, from 10 to 1.”

These tips will reduce the number of emails (or phone calls) that we will need to trade.

Six: Don’t Hold Back on the Facts, Especially the Ugly Facts.  Sixty percent of the substantive calls we receive involve employment issues; issues that often are highly fact sensitive.

So, for example, when you call me for advice on how to terminate a long-term poor performer, give me the good, the bad, and especially the ugly facts. Tell me that the employee has had good performance reviews – a potentially bad fact. Tell me that the employee complained two weeks ago about racial harassment or fraudulent bookkeeping practices – a probable ugly fact. Tell me that a new executive director joined the nonprofit nine months ago and has higher performance expectations – a likely good fact.

Also, as a general rule, it is better to not include detailed facts in emails pertaining to personnel issues and other sensitive topics. People are not always careful about what they type and/or might use a poor choice of language to explain the facts. Moreover, emails are sometimes misdirected because the sender picked the wrong name for the e-mail address book – always double check recipients’ names before hitting “send.” At least once a month I receive an email that wasn’t intended for me, often because the intended recipient has the same first or last name as I do.

Seven: Don’t Invite People To Join a Conference Call with a Lawyer Without First Checking with the Lawyer. When one of our volunteer lawyers steps forward to assist a nonprofit, we normally schedule an introductory call to discuss, among other things, the details of the project. On occasion and without providing advance notice, the client contact will invite one or more people to join the call. This can lead to some very awkward moments because sometimes it is not appropriate to have other people involved in the meeting. Here’s why.

The attorney-client privilege is designed to allow a client and a lawyer to have frank discussions about legal issues without having to worry about those discussions becoming discoverable in legal proceedings. Depending upon the circumstances, the privilege may be destroyed if (1) a person without a need to know participates in the discussions; (2) a non-manager is involved in the discussions; and/or (3) one of the participants discloses the legal advice to someone who is outside of management or has no need to know.

Here are two common scenarios. First, Executive Director Jesse calls us and asks for advice regarding a claim of sexual harassment made against Program Manager Dana. We line up Volunteer Lawyer Peyton to work on the project and then set up the introductory call with Jesse and Peyton.  Without telling us, Jesse invites Dana to participate. Because Dana has been accused of misconduct, Dana should not be on the call. Dana’s interests and the nonprofit’s interests might be adverse, and Dana’s participation on the call might well destroy the attorney-client privilege.  Peyton likely will need time to evaluate whether and to what extent Dana can be involved in future discussions.

Second, Val has designed a new logo for the nonprofit and Jesse wants to make sure the nonprofit owns the rights to the logo. We line up Volunteer Lawyer Chris to work on the project and, without telling us, Jesse invites Val to participate. Val should not be on the call. It is possible that Val’s interests are adverse to the nonprofit—resolution of that issue will depend upon whether Val is an employee, independent contractor, or volunteer, and possibly upon whether Val signed any documents setting forth ownership rights in the logo.

In each situation, it may be necessary to ask the unexpected attendee to drop off the call in order to not risk losing the attorney-client privilege and to allow the volunteer lawyer to provide a candid assessment of the situation to Jesse. Dana and Val might not appreciate being excluded, especially after they have been invited, and, even if they do not feel that way, it is awkward to have to ask someone to exit a meeting.

Thus, before inviting someone to a meeting with a lawyer, ask the lawyer if it is okay to do so.

Christine Michelle Duffy croppedChristine Michelle Duffy is a senior staff attorney with Pro Bono Partnership. Christine is editor-in-chief and contributing author of the critically acclaimed treatise Gender Identity and Sexual Orientation Discrimination in the Workplace: A Practical Guide, and a contributor to the treatise New Jersey Employment Law

The photo at top is courtesy of Creative Commons/Billy Brown

Posted in Nonprofit, Opportunities, Pro Bono Partnership | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Free Press: Race, the Media, and Politics in the Trump Era

Posted on by James L. Thompson, Free Press

Free Press group-shot-standing


One of the most important roles news outlets have is their power to convene. They can bring together community members and those in positions of power, and provide a space for thoughtful conversation while asking necessary, but uncomfortable, questions.

So over the weekend, News Voices: New Jersey partnered with WNYC in Newark to bring together local leaders, lawmakers, artists and residents to engage in important discussions about race, the media and politics in the Trump era.

More than 150 people came together at the Newark Public Library to have a critical conversation about the ways these issues play out in the city. The discussion took place as thousands were taking action at airports across the country in defense of the rights of refugees and Muslims.

FP Neark

My colleague Mike Rispoli and I started planning this event with WNYC’s Rebecca Carroll last August. But the conversation about race in America has taken on new meaning and urgency over the last 11 days.

We were all there to all listen, share and reflect on what we could do to better understand the impact of systemic and structural racism in America.

The program included three one-on-one conversations covering the American dream, tokenism, black feminism and the women’s marches.

Speakers included New Jersey Sen. Robert Menendez; Rep. Donald Payne Jr.; Newark-based poet Paula Neves; local educator, mentor and community organizer A’Dorian Murray-Thomas; gallery owner and activist Jasmine Wahi; and feminist theorist and Rutgers professor Brittney Cooper.

This live event was just one way to bring journalism out of the newsroom and into a community. Instead of having these conversations in a WNYC studio, those speaking could hear from and interact with people in attendance. Instead of people passively listening to “important” people speaking, they could see those figures, ask questions and respond in real time to important ideas.

And — as we do with all of our News Voices events — we invited all those in attendance to host their own conversations. This enabled people to discuss what they heard and think about ways to turn ideas into action.

FP Newark 2

Here’s a recap and some takeaways from the event:

The American Dream

Sen. Menendez and A’Dorian Murray-Thomas shared personal stories about their journeys as members of New Jersey’s Hispanic and Black communities, respectively.

Menendez drew on his experience as a determined high-school student whose teachers failed to take seriously his desire to get into the best schools available.

Murray-Thomas recalled her struggle as a young Black student to overcome racial and cultural barriers to a good education. She spoke of her initiative SHE Wins, which mentors young, disadvantaged girls seeking better educational and career opportunities and more civic engagement.

The focal point of their conversation was that a good education is one of the single most valuable ways to overcome the barriers of structural and systematic racism.

Thoughts on the Women’s March

Brittney Cooper and Jasmine Wahi had a candid conversation about the role race played in the recent women’s marches.

Cooper, a respected black feminist theorist, spoke about ongoing tensions between the march’s largely white leadership and black feminists, and the work that needs to be done to unite communities and movements.

Wahi touched on the impact art has on feminism. Her Gateway Project Spaces is a gallery and artist workspace that engages Newark’s creative community in critical dialogues about race and social justice.


Identity Politics and Tokenism

Rep. Donald Payne Jr. and Luso-American Ironbound poet Paula Neves discussed their experiences with identity politics. In particular, they spoke about what it means to be seen, and how dehumanizing it feels to be unseen.

To illustrate this, Payne told a story about encountering a traffic cop as a young man in Newark. When he was pulled over, the police officer treated him harshly and threatened to throw him in jail. After Payne handed over his license, the officer changed his tone completely upon realizing that Payne was the son of a distinguished South Ward city councilman. In a matter of moments, Payne went from being “unseen” as a nameless young Black man to being “seen” as the son of someone in power.

Neves took this idea and spoke about how people choose to see or not see people. For instance, as the child of Portuguese immigrants in Newark, Neves grew up around people of color but was often identified as White.

FP Newark 3

Q & A, Group Discussions and Next Steps

As important as the program itself was the audience, which was racially diverse and included a mix of Newark residents and folks from the broader region.

When we broke into the open-dialogue section of the program, people organized themselves into small groups to talk about what inspired them during the one-on-one conversations — and how to turn that energy into action.

But we weren’t done yet. We asked participants to write down one thing they were taking away from the event, whether it was an idea that moved them or something they wanted to act on.

While leaving, people posted their notes on a wall for all to see. The results were remarkable. Here are a few of the observations we saw that inspired us:

  • Mentoring young people and providing educational opportunities that focus on advancement are needed to help break the cycle of poverty and inequality.
  • White people and those in positions of privilege need a better understanding of the struggles that people of color encounter in American society.
  • We need to identify structural and systemic racism whenever we see it in our institutions — to call it out and work with policymakers, residents and civic leaders to develop initiatives that measure progress.
  • Educating our youth about their culture and their history is essential.
  • We need to identify the steps we can take together and the roles each of us can play in highlighting issues that contribute to inequality.

Many attendees expressed interest in participating in more public dialogues. Just as important are the steps local media and News Voices can take to shed light on social justice issues.

Here are a few:

  • Raising up the good programs, best practices, and actions that can lead to positive change for the residents of Newark
  • Pinpointing ways that we can strengthen local media and support independent local journalism
  • Forging collaborations between local media and community organizations
  • Convening discussions on topics local residents care about
  • Educating community leaders and residents on the importance of media literacy and how it can help foster change

Stay tuned for info on upcoming News Voices activities in Newark.

To hear the full audio recording of the event, go here.


jamesJames works with Free Press members, allies and community members on the News Voices: New Jersey project. Throughout his career as an organizer, James has assisted in developing models and methods to increase community engagement and advocacy for a stronger and more inclusive democracy. For more information on Free Press’ News Voices New Jersey project, click here.

Posted in Community Building, Free Press, Informed Communities, Media | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Creative New Jersey: The Spark of Collaboration in Asbury Park

Posted on by Kacy O’Brien, Program Manager, Creative New Jersey

AP Dodge Blog head image

On January 11 & 12, 2017, the Creative Asbury Park Call to Collaboration took place and welcomed a highly diverse group of individuals representing all areas of city life in Asbury Park.

This two-day gathering was part of Creative New Jersey’s statewide series of community-based convenings, aimed at helping to fuel current efforts already in action and to foster creativity, collaboration, and inclusion by facilitatinDSC_0757_resizedg cross-sector partnerships in commerce, education, philanthropy, government, and culture.

Over the course of the two-day meeting, participants grappled with topics that fell under our central guiding question:

How can we work more creatively and collaboratively to build our local economy, strengthen ties across our culturally rich community, and leverage our diverse assets, so that all who live, work and play in Asbury Park can benefit from our city’s renaissance?

Thirty-nine breakout sessions took place on topics as varied as the skills and interests of the 125+ participants.

The energy and vibrancy of those conversations sparked new collaborations and strengthened partnerships, leading to a variety of actionable outcomes including:


  • A new Mayor’s Youth Council (the result of conversations led by Asbury Park High School students)
  • More collaborative approaches to reaching out to and helping homeless individuals and families
  • Social service organizations working across industries to bring services to clients in need
  • An arts & culture and tourism collaboration between several organizations and groups with plans for a multi-cultural city-wide festival
  • The launch of a Mayor’s Wellness Campaign
  • Increasing the number and reach of existing re-entry programs and partnering with like-minded organizations who can help to
    broaden this service to more people

Creative Asbury Park’s Call to Collaboration was supported by many generous restaurant sponsors, including a delicious cake from Confections of a Rock$tar – which echoed the feeling in the room!

If you want to become involved with the Creative Asbury Park members, please email us at and we’ll be sure to connect you.

There’s a new Creative Asbury Park Facebook group that recently launched and you can check out photos and videos on our Instagram account.

The compendium of notes from all thirty-nine discussions will be available soon on our website.

Day 2 cake_resized

Our next community is Camden and we are deep into preparations for the Creative Camden Call to Collaboration!  Let us know if you want to be included in that invitation list:


Kacy O’Brien is Creative New Jersey’s Program Manager and is a Lead New Jersey’s 2015 Fellow.

Creative New Jersey is dedicated to fostering creativity, innovation, and sustainability by empowering cross-sector partnerships in commerce, education, philanthropy, government, and culture in order to ensure dynamic communities and a thriving economy.


Creative New Jersey’s leaders and partners are regular contributors to the Dodge blog.

Posted in Collaboration, Community Building, Creative NJ | Leave a comment

Board Leadership: How to use a competitive advantage exercise to better understand your organization’s strengths

Posted on by Allison Trimarco

Steven Depolo

How to use a “competitive advantage” exercise to better understand your organization’s strengths

New Jersey is the most densely populated state in the nation – so it’s no surprise that it’s also densely populated with nonprofits.

The National Center for Charitable Statistics estimates that New Jersey has almost 39,000 incorporated nonprofits, and close to 26,000 of them are 501c3 public charities that raise funds from the public and philanthropic sources.

While this brings up some challenges, it also presents a strategic planning opportunity. Looking at your organization in light of other nonprofits can give you a new perspective on your own group’s strengths, and help you understand what it is about your nonprofit’s approach that makes it particularly valuable to the people you serve. Knowing these strengths can be a tremendous asset to your ongoing strategic planning.

While the ideas of competitive advantage or unique value proposition are not new in the for-profit world, we are only just starting to see them integrated into nonprofit strategic planning. In many cases, community needs are so pressing that it seems obvious that nonprofits are essential.

But understanding what sets your nonprofit apart can help your ongoing strategic thinking about how to strengthen your organization and better carry out your mission. This is less about figuring out how to best your competitors and more about making strategic decisions that amplify the best aspects of your organization.

So how do you figure out what sets you apart from other nonprofits? Start with this chart:

Who provides services similar to ours?

How are we similar?

How are we unique?





Consider other organizations that are similar to yours. Depending on what you do, there are numerous ways to frame this question. If you are a symphony, you can start by looking at other symphonies…but you also can also look at other choices available to people looking for an arts experience, like

Depending on what you do, there are numerous ways to frame this question. If you are a symphony, you can start by looking at other symphonies…but you also can also look at other choices available to people looking for an arts experience, like theaters, dance performances, or other types of concerts. You could even consider other choices that people might make with their leisure time, like going to a restaurant, shopping, or staying at home watching Netflix. You should select comparison organizations that will provide you with maximum insight into how your organization is viewed by the people you are trying to engage – be they clients, audience members, volunteers, or donors.

Once you have your list, look for similarities between your organization and each comparison group. Do you serve the same people? Seek similar outcomes? Share the same approach?

Then look for ways in which you are different. Do you serve different people? Maybe you offer a different service or experience or approach your work in a different way. Perhaps your service offers a different benefit to the people you serve. Maybe you carry out your work in a more efficient or effective way. What makes your approach unique and valuable for your constituents and your community?

Be disciplined when you are doing this exercise. It’s easy to say, “no one else offers an exact replica of our service” — but that’s not the point. While it might be true that you are the only group presenting Baroque music or conserving field mice habitats, you can dig deeper to better understand the roots of your uniqueness and success.

For example, I recently did this exercise with a company that presents an unusual type of dance — there really isn’t another company that produces the same kind of experience, so they had a hard time coming up with a list of comparison organizations. They settled on looking at other mid-sized dance companies even though the artistic product is not exactly similar.

During the comparison exercise, they realized that one thing that sets them apart is that they have never gotten into debt (a pretty common occurrence for smaller arts groups, unfortunately). This helped them to understand that their conservative financial approach has been a key to their success and longevity – and they should continue to prioritize it when making future decisions.

An advocacy group completed the exercise, and realized that it is their staff expertise that sets them apart from other groups with similar mission and intent, many of whom are more volunteer-driven. They have both lawyers and conservationists on staff, which informs their policy decisions and their advocacy work, makes them a leader in the field, and positions them as a valuable collaborator for many organizations with similar values. Understanding this, they place a high strategic priority on maintaining a strong staff and investing in their professional development.

Once you take the idea of “competition” out of this exercise, you can see it is really about understanding your own strengths and then using them to improve your chances of success. Your clients, audiences, donors, and volunteers are all comparing you to other similar organizations, so why shouldn’t your leadership do this as well? It can only help you to better understand what sets you apart and makes your work truly essential to our community.

Allison Trimarco

Allison Trimarco

Allison Trimarco is the founder and principal of Creative Capacity (, a consulting firm that collaborates with nonprofits to find creative solutions to management challenges. She is also an affiliated consultant and instructor at The Nonprofit Center at La Salle University’s School of Business (

Photo at top: Creative Commons/ Steven Depolo

Posted in Board Leadership, Leadership, Nonprofit, Technical Assistance | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Sustainable Jersey: Less water for all of us

Posted on by  Randall Solomon, Co-Director, Sustainable Jersey


Drought warning in effect for 14 NJ counties

Even as New Jersey is battered with heavy rains from a nor’easter expected to bring two days of wet weather, the rainfall won’t be enough to lift a drought warning and buoy the state’s dwindling water supply.

The state Department of Environmental Protection in October issued the drought warning for 14 north and central New Jersey counties — Bergen, Essex, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren. In addition, Burlington, Camden, Gloucester and Salem counties remain under a drought watch, while only Atlantic, Cape May and Cumberland counties are classified as “normal” in regards to precipitation levels.

Why You Should Care

Droughts are damaging events. The human and ecosystem costs can be enormous, but they are also opportunities, a chance to change personal behaviors and put in place new, innovative water policies that are not discussed during normal years. The goal of the drought warning is to preserve and balance available water supplies in an effort to avert more serious water shortages in the future. The warning also reinforces the need for residents and businesses in impacted counties to conserve water.

“The situation in our reservoir systems is becoming more critical, with some systems dropping to half their capacity or less,” said DEP Commissioner Bob Martin. “Without knowing how much precipitation we are going to get over the winter to replenish our water sources, it is vital that every resident and business step up efforts to voluntarily reduce water use in the hope of averting a water emergency and mandatory restrictions.”

Since Sustainable Jersey’s inception, DEP has been a strong advocate and partner and continues to be critical to the ongoing evolution of the program.

What You Can Do

Many of us still have old toilets, showerheads, washing machines and other appliances that are not water efficient, and we should replace them. We need to take a new look at the water hungry, non-native plants and grass we have in our yards. And we should seek out and explore new, renewable sources of water, including water treatment and reuse, rainwater harvesting and water desalination.

A number of New Jersey municipalities have passed water conservation ordinances. Most towns limit days and hours when lawn watering or other irrigation can occur. Some towns have simply established a sprinkler use ordinance that sets a schedule for lawn watering, while others pass an annual resolution to establish seasonal restrictions.

Sustainable Jersey has a number of actions related to water conservation including the Water Conservation Ordinance, Water Conservation Education, Minimize Water Consumption and Rain Gardens. In late February 2017, we are adding new green infrastructure actions, including a Water Loss Audit and the Stormwater Management Ordinance.

By using water more efficiently and by using more water-efficient products, we can mitigate the effects of drought.

But, drought or no drought, water conservation needs to be a way of life.  If you agree, here are a few things to get you started.

  • Lead a Water Conservation Education Program: Water conservation is not possible without the support and participation of residents and businesses that consume water. It is essential our communities get information on the benefits of water conservation as well as water conservation techniques. Encourage your local green team to do a Water Conservation Education program for residents and local businesses. You can focus this program on the drought. Use the Sustainable Jersey action to learn more: Water Conservation Education Program.
  • Get a DEP Municipal Drought Awareness Kit: DEP can provide you with its free Drought Awareness Kit for New Jersey Municipalities. This kit includes ready-to-use flyers with conservation tips, a media release template and more. To request a drought awareness kit, contact:
  • Change Your Habits: Every drop counts; for example, a leaking toilet can waste up to 200 gallons of water per day. Here are a few tips to save water from DEP:
  • Don’t let the faucet run while brushing, shaving or washing the dishes.
  • Run your washing machines and dishwashers only when full.
  • Install water-saving showerheads and faucet aerators.
  • Fix leaky faucets.
  • Don’t wash your car at home – a car wash uses less water and recycles it, too.
  • With the end of the growing season, be sure to turn off automatic lawn and garden sprinkler systems.

For more NJ water supply status information and to view the DEP Drought Administrative Order, visit: To learn new ways to conserve water, visit


For more about Sustainable Jersey: Website  Facebook  Twitter  Instagram   LinkedIn


Posted in Community Building, Environment, Sustainable Jersey | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Poetry Friday: Inauguration Poems of the Past

Posted on by Dodge Poetry

Poetry Program Logo

Today is Inauguration Day, and we invite you to spend some time with the six poems that have been part of inauguration ceremonies of the past. While poems are often part of public ceremony, it wasn’t until 1961 that an inaugural poem was included in the ceremony. Here is a list, with links, of all of the poems read to commemorate this historic day:

Barack Obama’s Inauguration

2013 – Richard Blanco reading “One Today” (video)

2009 – Elizabeth Alexander’s poem “Praise Song for the Day

Bill Clinton’s Inauguration

1997 – Miller Williams’ poem “Of History and Hope

1993 – Maya Angelou’s poem “On the Pulse of Morning

Jimmy Carter’s Inauguration

1977 – James Dickey’s poem “The Strength of Fields

John F. Kennedy’s Inauguration

1961 – Robert Frost’s poem “The Gift Outright


Posted in Poetry, Poetry Archives, Poets | Tagged , | Leave a comment

CNJG: Our Democracy Needs Our Problem Solvers

Posted on by Nina Stack, Council of New Jersey Grantmakers

white house

I’m acutely aware that I’m writing this blog the week our new president will be sworn in. It is that event that has me thinking a lot about Alexis de Tocqueville’s seminal book Democracy in America as we once again observe the peaceful transition of power.

I am also a “Hamilton” junkie so I keep reminding myself of what this means as I listen to Washington’s schooling to Hamilton in the song “One Last Time” about how the transition will prove our country’s strength. And for those that haven’t had a chance to see Hamilton yet, I offer a little School House Rock help to remind us how we got here.

Hamiton’s “One Last Time:”

School House Rock:

In his book, Tocqueville spoke of what I believe is one the greatest examples of our country’s and our democracy’s strength – our associations. What he calls associations, we now refer to as our social sector.

Americans of all ages, all conditions, all minds constantly unite. Not only do they have commercial and industrial associations in which all take part, but they also have a thousand other kinds: religious, moral, grave, futile, very general and very particular, immense and very small; Americans use associations to give fêtes, to found seminaries, to build inns, to raise churches, to distribute books, to send missionaries to the antipodes; in this manner they create hospitals, prisons, schools.

It seems he may have found our desire to associate in this way a bit excessive but it is clear he envies and finds value in our ability to unite, to come together, to build, to care for our citizens, to solve problems. Today, the social sector in America is more robust than ever — and more essential.

My colleague Tim Delaney at the National Council of Nonprofits speaks often about how it is the social sector that are  the “incubators of innovation, laboratories of leadership, protectors of taxpayers, responders in times of trouble, stimulators of the economy, and weavers of community fabric.” Those of us working in charities are the problem solvers making a difference every day in every city and town across this country.

There is a lot of talk lately about how the “disruptors” are so important to our economy, our society — and they are. However, please remember that nonprofits were among the original disruptors and they are still at it.

There is a vital thread through the group training young women how to code and young men in construction trades to the Community Development Corporation creating a state of the art early child learning center, from organization training immigrant entrepreneurs to the one designing transportation alternatives for the elderly.

Tocqueville wrote his book over 180 years ago; so much still holds true.  We do unite and our associations, our social sector is at the heart of that practice.

As a new President arrives and we ready for a new New Jersey Governor next year, the time has never been more important for all those working in community, in education and healthcare, the environment and criminal justice, in elder care and child advancement, to fully claim our titles and our realm as problem solvers.



Nina Stack is President of the Council of New Jersey Grantmakers, the statewide association of more than 130 funding organizations working in and for New Jersey.

The Council is the center for philanthropy in the state, serving the leading independent, corporate, family and community foundations as well as public grantmakers of our state. CNJG supports its members by strengthening their capacity to address New Jersey and society’s most difficult problems.

Photo at top: Creative Commons/ Stefan Fussan

Posted in Advocacy, Council of New Jersey Grantmakers, Philanthropy | Leave a comment

Pro Bono Partnership Pundit: 7 Simple Suggestions for Making Your Lawyer Happy 

Posted on by Christine Michelle Duffy, Pro Bono Partnership

Close-up Of Young Man Working On Computer At Desk

The New Jersey office of Pro Bono Partnership in 2015 helped 299 nonprofit clients with 654 formal projects and 788 resource calls. As we closed out 2016, we were well on the way to shattering those numbers, with the same internal staffing.

Given this volume, I thought I would share my list of seven things nonprofits could do to make a lawyer happy. As you will see, these tips will result in more efficient service for nonprofits, thus benefitting them as well.

Here are the first four. I will share the final three items on my wish list in our next post.

One: Your E-mails Should Include Descriptive Subject Lines.  We all receive way too many e-mails, a fair number of which are spam. Earlier this year, via an e-mail, one of our clients asked us to review a contract that arose out of a grant it had been awarded. The subject line of the e-mail read: “Hooray!!! We just were awarded a $1 Million Grant!!!!”  I was seconds away from deleting the e-mail without reading it, as I thought it was another “puff” piece – some days I just don’t have time to scan those. A better subject line, which would have caught my attention, would have been “Good Deeds Nonprofit Requests Assistance with the Review of a Contract.

Two: Please Be Patient. Because of the volume of e-mails and calls that we receive, we often engage in triage. We also have lots of scheduled conference calls and meetings. As a result, we might not be able to get back to you the same or next business day. If something is truly urgent, a phone call usually is best. Sending multiple e-mails and making repeated phone calls the same day will not expedite my response time.

Adding the “high importance” flag to your e-mail doesn’t move it up on my priority list. I’ll triage e-mails the same way irrespective of red exclamations point appended to them.

If you don’t get a response to an e-mail within a few days, it would be worth calling us to make sure we received it. Perhaps it still is in your drafts’ folder, is lost somewhere in the Ethernet, was snagged by a spam filter, or was deleted because the subject line started with “Hooray!!!

In a true emergency, if you don’t get a response the same day, call back 24 hours later.

Three: Don’t Reuse an Unrelated E-mail Thread to Raise a New Legal Issue. As a general rule, you should never repurpose an e-mail thread to discuss a new topic. A new legal issue should be raised in a new e-mail. Here’s why.

When you ask me a question or need help with a new project, I might need to look for a volunteer lawyer to assist you. On occasion, especially when a project is time sensitive, I might forward your e-mail to a potential volunteer who has worked with your nonprofit in the past so that the volunteer has the relevant background. If you have unrelated e-mail messages in the same e-mail thread, I might end up accidentally sharing the unrelated information with a person who doesn’t have a need to know.

Similarly, if we trade e-mails over time, the unrelated material gets buried at the bottom of a long e-mail thread. You might decide to share the most current e-mail exchange with a manager you need to bring into the loop. That other person might not have a need to know about the unrelated project (e.g., perhaps you had previously asked me about how to terminate that manager).

Four: Do Use the Same E-mail Thread for the Same Topic.  When a nonprofit sends me an e-mail about a new project, I might have to ask for more information and supporting documentation.  One in four nonprofits will send that information via one or more separate e-mails with different subject lines.  So, instead of having all related information in one thread, I might need to refer to two or more threads.  This needlessly makes things more complicated, including when I need to forward the background information on to the lawyer who volunteered to help you with the project.  Also, when you need to send attachments that will not transmit in one email because they cumulatively make the e-mail too large, please identify the emails with the same subject line and an identifier such as “1 of 4,” “2 of 4,” etc.

By the way, when your computer or photocopier assigns scanned documents file names such as “docazqtx20161219111758,” before e-mailing them to me, please change each of the file names to something that is descriptive, such as “Bylaws revised November 2016.”  Doing so helps us (and our volunteers) when we file the documents away and access them at a later date.

Christine Michelle Duffy is a senior staff attorney with Pro Bono Partnership.  Christine is editor-in-chief and contributing author of the critically acclaimed treatise Gender Identity and Sexual Orientation Discrimination in the Workplace: A Practical Guide, and a contributor to the treatise New Jersey Employment Law.

Posted in Pro Bono Partnership, Technical Assistance | Leave a comment

Local News Lab: Reimagining How We Get Community News in New Jersey

Posted on by Dodge


Imagine you were given an assignment. Here it is:

Two weeks before Christmas, gather the major legacy and new media players in your state for a brainstorming meeting that will take up the better part of their day. Just to make things more interesting, also lure a nice sampling of the academics and advocates who track trends in local media.

You’ve got three weeks to get it done. Go!

Could you nail that task — without losing hours of sleep and perhaps your sanity? How could you identify all the key players across a sprawling state? How would you persuade short-handed editors, busy pulling together year-in-review packages, to give up a day to make this meeting?  How do you get academics to leave campus in the middle of finals?

I had exactly that challenge late last year, trying to organize a session on Dec. 12 at the Center for Cooperative Media at New Jersey’s Montclair State University.

Guess what? It turned out to be a piece of holiday cake.

That’s a tribute to the coherent and collaborative a network of news outlets, both venerable and newbie, that’s been woven in New Jersey over the last five years, thanks to the efforts of the Dodge Foundation and the Center at Montclair.

I doubt that such a gathering could have been pulled together on such a tight timetable with such ease in any other state of the union.

Here’s who ended up agreeing to come (though, in full candor, a very typical New Jersey phenomenon – an epic, rain-induced traffic snarl on the Garden State Parkway – prevented some of them from ever making it to Montclair that day):

  • Representatives of the biggest newspapers covering the state.
  • Key players at all four of the public radio stations broadcasting in New Jersey: WNYC, WHYY, WBGO and WFMU.
  • A sampling of the impressive cohort New Jersey digital media startups that have hung in there (with dollops of help from Dodge) over the last five years: NJ Spotlight, Brick City Live, New Brunswick Today, NJ Shorebeat.
  • Academics from Montclair State, Rutgers, Rowan and CUNY.
  • Advocates who track media issues from organizations such as the Citizens Campaign and Media Mobilizing Project.

Admittedly, after 40 years spent working for news organizations that sit along the Delaware River and cover New Jersey, I had some relationships I could put to work gathering this crew. And people I knew well in turn had relationships with others whom they could assure, “This one sounds like it might be worth your time.”

Just as valuable, though, was the map of New Jersey’s news ecosystem that the Center for Cooperative Media has been putting together for much of this decade, supported by Dodge.

And, if you put a lie detector on everyone who said, “Yes, I’ll come,” they’d probably say the main reason they considered this a meeting worth scrambling to attend boiled down to two words: Dodge Foundation.   If Dodge was making a bet on an initiative involving the future of New Jersey media, then it was best to pay attention.

The topic of the meeting was an effort by the Free Press organization, funded by Dodge and the Democracy Fund, to persuade elected officials in Trenton to do something that they are not at first blush going to want to do:

  • Spend part of an anticipated windfall on something other than their pet concerns.

The windfall (as much as $1 billion) may come to New Jersey through the federal auction of broadcast spectrum that is now taking place, laboriously, under the auspices of the Federal Communications Commission.

In the auction, New Jersey is in a unique position among states. Under Gov. Christie, the state got out of the business of directly producing public television, but it hung onto ownership of four public TV licenses (i.e. rights to broadcast using spectrum bandwidth). The licenses are now leased to WNET public TV in New York City, which operates them as NJTV.

The goal of the auction is to free up a swath of spectrum that the FCC can then sell to telecom companies looking to improve 5G service. That makes the New Jersey licenses, smack in the middle of the populous mid-Atlantic, among the most valuable ones on the block. If the auction reaches any conclusion where buyers and sellers agree on a price, New Jersey stands to make some money.

Operating on default instincts, politicians in the state Capitol would use that money as a pain-free plug for various well-known holes in the state budget, such as pension costs.

But Free Press, backed by Dodge and the Democracy Fund, seeks a hearing for a different idea: Earmark a significant chunk of the proceeds for a new fund or endowment. The fund would provide seed capital to innovative proposals aim meeting the information needs of New Jersey residents and communities.

The logic is clean and powerful: This windfall got generated by selling off remnants of the 20th-century system of public media. At least some of it should be used to invest in building a 21st-century, digital/mobile model for public media.

In this way, New Jersey, long a media stepchild to New York and Philly, could become a national leader in modern local media.

This endowment — for now, let’s call it “the New Jersey Fund for Public Information” — might have something like $10 million a year to invest in creative ideas for how to scratch the local information itch.

Politically, that’s a long shot – but with a new governor being elected in 2017 and many in politics fretting over the “fake news” phenomenon and the fraying of the “honest broker” concept of news media – it’s not a hopeless quest.

To sell voters and taxpayers on the idea, however, you have to be able to show them clearly and succinctly how the fund could be deployed to meet their community’s information needs.

Getting a start on that creative task – that’s why we wanted to assemble the journalists, academics and advocates on Dec. 12 in Montclair.

They came, they brainstormed and they presented their ideas for critical evaluation by their peers in a lively, Shark Tank-like session in meeting room at Montclair that presented a stunning, though fog-shrouded view, of the Manhattan skyline.

Here’s what they came up with (think of this list not as a comprehensive list of possibilities, but as a first course to whet the appetite for more dialogue, more creativity, more great ideas):

  • Create an app, and a digital reporting team, that would track progress and milestones on all laws approved by Trenton.   Statehouse reporting has traditional focused on the politics of getting bills passed.  But those reporters rarely circle back to check on whether that bill that caused all the fuss a year ago is actually being enforced, actually working, actually doing what it was supposed to do.  Audiences often tell journalists that their lack of follow-up on stories is one of their most annoying sins.
  • Create a Pro Publica for New Jersey. Pro Publica is the New York City-based nonprofit investigative reporting outfit that does deep dives into data and emerges with important stories that it often co-produces with major newspapers, magazines and broadcast outlets.  The idea is that New Jersey taxpayers deserve a watchdog with a strong bite and time to dig.
  • Set up a New Jersey Right to Know Institute. This institute would deploy the time and expertise of seasoned journalists and attorneys to help New Jersey residents gain access to key information about how their government is functioning. This is information to which they have a right by law, but often get blocked from seeing by red tape, cost and outright bureaucratic resistance.
  • Innovate with “Community Information Districts.” Many New Jersey towns have set up “special services districts,” where taxpayers within the district pay an extra fee to get particular services, whether business corridor development, watershed protection, or libraries. The idea here is for the fund to help fashion a model for towns to set up their own Community Information Districts. Revenue from a small, per-capita fee would be used to support a better information infrastructure for the town: an open-date website; a hyperlocal news site; a regular podcast, whatever town leaders felt would scratch their residents’ information itch.
  • Initiate “AmeriCorps for Journalists.” Create fellowships for a diverse cohort of young journalists, who would commit for at least two years to covering local news in areas now underserved by media, working in concert with established news organizations.
  • Tell the state’s chief executive: “Hearken, Governor.” Modeled on Hearken, a public radio project that crowd-sources the questions it then investigates, this effort would enlist media outlets around the state to crowdsource which question New Jersey voters most want their governor to answer each month. All the media outlets would then publish or air the answer.

One team delved not into a particular idea, but the structure for how the fund should operate.  This team’s suggestions, which track fairly closely to Free Press’s thinking, were:

  • Set up a review board of informed citizens and media professionals to vet applications to the fund and make recommendations to its politically appointed board.
  • Give preference to proposals that a) have a clear local focus b) stress collaboration among partners and c) have a plan to generate sustaining revenue.
  • Be open to applications from entities not traditionally thought of as being part of “the news media” e.g. libraries, arts groups, civic tech.

Do you have thoughts or questions about any of these ideas? Do you have a better idea of your own? Either way, let us know and I’m make sure your feedback is incorporated into Free Press’ work.

Share your thoughts in the comments below or email News Voices: New Jersey Director Mike Rispoli at

We’ll try to answer your questions while incorporating your feedback into our work.


Chris Satullo is a civic-engagement consultant working with Free Press on the News Voices project. He formerly was a top news executive at the Philadelphia Inquirer and WHYY Inc.

Photo at Top: Center for Cooperative Media at Montclair State University

Posted in Community Building, Informed Communities | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

ArtPride NJ: Here Comes the Sun

Posted on by Ann Marie Miller, Art Pride NJ


2016 is over to everyone’s relief. For most it’s been “annus horribilis” which needs little or no translation. The amount of upset and turmoil from 18 months of presidential electioneering, raw social and other media, and an overflow of celebrity deaths is ready to be relieved by the onset of a new year.

While there is also enough trepidation and fear about what to expect in 2017, I’m going to buck the trend and opt for optimism, so here goes! Here is a list of five un-resolutions — things to hope for instead.

  1. More activism – whether you are planning to march on DC, Trenton or Philadelphia on January 21, the undercurrent is that complacency is no longer an option. It’s time to get familiar with your elected officials and support your favorite nonprofits. That’s plural—from the arts to the environment, you can still date that check 12/31/16 and make sure the nonprofit sector gets the infrastructure boost it deserves to operate with impunity and continue to make a difference in your community. If you need help in learning who your legislators are, a good starting point is ArtPride NJ’s Arts Action Center where you can contact elected officials about pertinent arts issues and legislation.
  2. More philanthropy – Did you like that segue? Activism = philanthropy. If you can’t be there in person to affect change, you can put your money where your mouth is. There’s enough yapping on social media to equate to a considerable increase in philanthropy if each whining post was accompanied by a donation to that unnamed nonprofit organization mentioned in point No. 1.
  3. More kindness – A social trait we can all benefit from on a daily basis. Consider paying it forward from an extra tip to the hardworking waiter, to a return smile for the cashier at the supermarket. Fear and trepidation take their toll on facial muscles and smiles are catchy and suggest the love we harbor that is often submerged by life’s daily routine.
  4. More listening – This translates into “just shut up and listen.” All that remorse and misgiving needs to vent, but sometimes it’s wise (and welcome) to exercise self-restraint and just listen to our co-worker, our spouse, our neighbor and yes, that person who thinks differently from you. This could also translate into “unplugging,” for a bit and removing oneself from the never-ending onslaught of angst that social media perpetuates. Fight the algorithms, fill up your coffee cup, place it close to your mouth and just listen for a bit.
  5. More art — did you really think I would miss this one? The political climate is certain to provide fodder for what artists do best—reflect society at its worst and best. It’s already apparent (I even had my personal stab at it and feel more on the horizon). This translates into more creativity which has the most positive implication for 2017. We are inherently creative as humans whether we acknowledge it or deny it out of modesty. It’s time to imprison the inner critic and unleash creative energy that will generate art that inventively documents this critical moment in time.

What are your thoughts? What do we need more (or less) of in 2017? How can we shift gears from a year that resonated with disdain and despair into a year of action, enterprise and beneficence?

I have faith in our collective will as humans to turn the tide, so here are best wishes for a creative, charitable and compassionate New Year!

annmarie1-150x150Ann Marie Miller is the Director of Advocacy and Public Policy at ArtPride New Jersey and a regular contributor to the Dodge Blog. Email her at Click here to visit ArtPride’s website.

Photo at top: Creative Commons / tsuacctnt

Posted in Advocacy, ArtPride New Jersey, Arts, Arts Advocacy, Nonprofit, Philanthropy | 2 Comments

Sustainable Jersey: Bringing the “Tech” into Sustainability

Posted on by Lauren Skowronski, Director for Community Engagement, Sustainable Jersey

SJ code1

 How does technology relate to sustainability and Sustainable Jersey? The classic definition of sustainability suggests that our future depends on supporting three interdependent domains: environment, economy and society. Among these, society often gets overlooked. But in fact, it may be the most important of the three, as it determines not just our quality of life, but our capacity to act together to solve our problems.

If our government, as an extension of our society, is ineffective, our attempts to solve sustainability issues will also be ineffective. Through Sustainable Jersey’s new suite of Public Information & Engagement (PIE) actions, we hope to enable municipalities to upgrade how they operate to provide better public information and services, engage citizens in public decision making and problem solving and track and communicate sustainability goals. In many cases, innovative technologies already exist to help municipalities, but in some cases, technologies still need to be created.

First State-Wide Civic Tech Competition in NJ: Coding for Community

You’re invited to dream big as Sustainable Jersey towns will be paired with innovative minds to create a tool that can address a sustainability or public engagement need within your community. Think apps, data and input gathering, visualizations and beyond.

What would benefit your community? For example, do you need community members to help locate potholes or invasive species in your park? Or how about an app to empower community members to start and fund art projects to beautify your town? Would it be useful to have a way to collect community input on master plans, upcoming events and new ordinances? Even better, let’s have a tool to map or measure data such as energy usage, waste reduction and bikeways. The options are endless; that is why we need your town’s ideas.

Local governments are increasingly tasked with figuring out how to share important information and data, providing services and responding to resident requests instantaneously, since people have become accustomed to receiving answers in real time.

SJ Code 2

Brian Platt, the director of the Jersey City Office of Innovation said, “Governments traditionally have limited technology resources and data analysis capabilities, but typically have a high degree of need for these types of advances.” He explains that there is a lot to be learned from the private sector and other communities that have brought successful technologies to address local public information and engagement issues. “Our team is focused on leveraging technology and data to improve quality of life and solve a variety of challenges we face as a city, and many of our tools and approaches have private sector origins.”

Brought to you by Sustainable Jersey, Coding for Community (CfC) is the first of its kind, New Jersey-wide civic tech competition. We’re pairing municipalities with techies to develop real sustainable solutions for local public information and engagement issues. Professional and student coders, programmers and digital designers from across the region will work with municipal staff, green team members and elected officials, similar to the now popular hackathons.

The competition kicks off with an all-day event on January 27, 2017, in Newark, where potential tech solutions to local issues will be identified and teams will form. AT&T is providing $10,000 to Sustainable Jersey to use for prize money. Brian Platt added, “We see the Coding for Community event as a way to connect other towns in New Jersey with a talented pool of tech experts that can help drive transformative change through the use of technology.”

Sustainable Jersey is partnering on this event with the City of Jersey City, Code for Trenton, Code for Jersey City, Code for Princeton, OpenGov, the New Jersey Innovation Institute, the New Jersey Institute of Technology and Sustainable Princeton. The Geraldine R. Dodge Foundation and the Knight Foundation are project funders.

Apply for the Pilot: Free PIE Technology Assistance for Two NJ Towns

Sustainable Jersey will also select two pilot municipalities to take part in a Public Information and Engagement (PIE) Technology Assessment. New Jersey municipal governments that are registered in the Sustainable Jersey program can submit an application for consideration.

If selected, the pilot town will be provided with a consultant who will conduct a PIE Technology Assessment to assist in the implementation of the PIE actions. The assessment will provide a roadmap for transitioning to new forms of communications and engagement through emerging technologies that include digital and online tools. If this sounds interesting, make sure that your town submits an application by February 7, 2017.

“There is no time to ‘wait and see’ with technology. This is where the world is headed and local governments will benefit from providing new ways for citizens to engage and better understand local challenges and opportunities,” said Justin Heyman, a municipal information technology director with over 13 years of experience in municipal technology.  Justin will be leading the PIE Technology Assessments and is also the president of GMIS International, which is a professional information technology association of worldwide government information technology leaders.

“If a municipality is thinking about applying for this opportunity, they should know that they don’t have to be far along the technology path; they just need to be ready to engage and support the recommendations that best fit the needs of their community,” Justin explained. “The selected towns will leave the process with a detailed roadmap complete with solution options allowing them to advance their efforts in public information and engagement.”

  • Apply for the pilot by February 5, 2017: The eligibility requirements, application and complete information can be found here: PIE Technology Assessments application:

Webinar: Join Us on January 4 to Learn More about these Initiatives

To help get you up to speed on these initiatives, Sustainable Jersey has a webinar planned for January 4, 2017 at 1:00 pm. Register for the webinar and learn about the Coding for Community competition and the pilot program.

For more about Sustainable Jersey: Website  Facebook  Twitter   Instagram   LinkedIn


Posted in Community Building, Informed Communities, Media, News & Announcements, Opportunities, Sustainable Jersey | Leave a comment
Search the Blog
Recent Posts