Posts Tagged ‘Creativity’

Continuing the Creativity Conversation

Wednesday, June 15th, 2011

Creative NJ logo

Over the past two days, more than 150 people participated in the Creative New Jersey conference, discussing how creativity and innovation can help revitalize New Jersey. (See this earlier blog post for background on the conference).

This was no ordinary conference, with the agenda predetermined. Rather, the conference followed an “open space” format, which has minimal structure. As shown in the photos below, participants set the agenda for the two days by suggesting topics for discussion and posting them on large sheets of paper to the “Marketplace” wall, labeled with a time and meeting room where the conversation would take place. Participants then chose from the Marketplace which conversations they wanted to join throughout the two days, remembering that if they weren’t feeling engaged or inspired by the discussion, they could leave at any time and join a different one (the “rule of two feet”).

Creativity Conference Announcing Topics

Creativity Conference

Creativity Conference Marketplace

Marketplace ideas for Creativity Conference

Choosing topics at Creativity Conference

Discussions covered a huge range of topics, including “How do we create meaningful work for young people?” and “How can we use public space to inspire innovation and revitalize communities?” as well as “Teaching to and measuring for creativity” and “If you have all the political support and money you needed (!) what would be your crazy BIG IDEA to encourage creativity and innovation in NJ?

Even those are just a small fraction of what took place.

Intrigued? You should be. There was no shortage of ideas, connections made and meaningful conversations.  And thanks to a coordinated effort and effective use of technology, all of these discussions have been captured and shared in real time on the CreativeNJ website. There, you can also find short, interesting interviews of the conference’s participants, as well as information about who was at the conference, and a gallery of photos.

It’s a lot of information and ideas to absorb – whether you were there or not. We urge you to take a look and get inspired, but we also urge you to take your time looking over the website to see what sparks your imagination (you can search by areas of interest), and revisit it occasionally.

Dodge helped sponsor and lead this effort because we care about the future livability of New Jersey – we’re focused on the issues that our home state faces and believe in supporting creativity, which we know takes on many different forms. We continually strive to bring people together in new and unexpected ways: we want to help spark ideas, make connections, and help you discover new resources.

Now that the conference is over, we have some questions for those who participated, but also for those of you who are thinking about the issues that New Jersey faces:

How do we keep the conversation and the momentum going?
What connections with other people and/or resources do you need help making?

Dodge has an arsenal of resources to offer: we make grants, of course, but we also have capacity building workshops to help you strengthen your organization as well as a suite of other financial and legal services that we underwrite. We can help you convene groups of people and make cross-sector connections, and we can offer you the conference space in which to hold meetings too. And as a foundation working solely on issues that impact New Jersey, we can also offer you our staff’s expertise, which we have developed over many years of criss-crossing the state, meeting with stakeholders from all sectors.

If you have ideas, questions, or comments, we want to hear them. Post them in the comments section below and help us keep the conversation rolling.

Images: Geraldine R. Dodge Foundation

GOOD on Better Neighborhoods

Wednesday, April 21st, 2010

Molly de Aguiar, Program Associate

GOOD guide to better neighborhoods

If you’re not familiar with GOOD (the magazine, the website, their events & videos), they are worth checking out. They show us how to collaborate – individuals, businesses and nonprofits – and move forward on a wide range of issues, and they are, for me, a really interesting example of building community and nurturing creativity through the internet.

They routinely give out assignments, such as “Help Us Create ‘Neighbor Day’” and “Design an Everyday Solution to an Extraordinary Problem” inviting anyone and everyone to participate. One of their most recent assignments was to design a way to give easier access to healthy, fresh food to people who receive government assistance. The winner of the Food Stamps and Farmers’ Market assignment shows us how this is already being done in Santa Monica, CA – useful, practical information for anyone else who might be working on these same issues.

I am also a fan of GOOD’s infographics, which are always fascinating.

Lately, I’ve been reading their feature on neighborhoods: what makes for a nice neighborhood? (See also Nate Silver‘s really interesting article, “The Most Livable Neighborhoods in New York“  in New York Magazine and his methodology for ranking them).

Also, how do you make your neighborhood better? As we continue to improve and expand Sustainable Jersey, these questions about improving our neighborhoods and communities are essential.

GOOD offers a lot of advice that may seem basic, but sometimes we need to be reminded to be good regulars at our local businesses, to throw an occasional block party, and to  get to know our neighbors. You can find their neighborhood issue here, which they will be updating until they’ve posted all of their articles. Given our work around healthy regional food systems, the article “Agriculture is the New Golf” is especially interesting.

You can also find GOOD on Facebook and on Twitter, where they ask a daily question (e.g., “Who or what inspires you?”), and it’s interesting to read people’s responses.

Do you like the neighborhood you live in? What would make it better – and what can you do to make it better?

* * *

Tickets for the 2010 Geraldine R. Dodge Poetry Festival go on sale through the NJPAC box office on Friday, April 23 at 10 am.

Thinking about Philanthropy – and Justice

Wednesday, December 9th, 2009

David Grant, President and CEO

Justice by Michael SandelI have been reading Michael Sandel’s book Justice, which stems from his popular course of the same name at Harvard.  In between chapters over the weekend, I have been reading proposals from nonprofit organizations seeking funding from Dodge in the new year.

In both cases, the predominant question on my mind has been Sandel’s subtitle: What’s The Right Thing To Do?

The book, by the way, would be a great holiday present for anyone you know who appreciates having his or her assumptions challenged.  Just when you think you know what “the right thing to do” is, Sandel asks you to look at it another way.

He begins with some fascinating questions of judgment and, inevitably, politics, using real life situations.  Should there be laws against price gouging in the wake of natural disasters?  Should Purple Hearts be awarded for psychological injuries?  Should the CEO’s and top executives of banks bailed out with taxpayer money get bonuses?

And he uses hypothetical situations.  If you were the engineer on a runaway train, with five people working on the track in front of you, and you could turn onto a side track where one person was working, would you?  Most people say yes.  If you were watching the runaway train from a bridge and could push one person onto the tracks to save the five people working further down them, would you?  Most people say no.  In each case, there is a choice: either one person will die or five people will die. Yet we make different judgments.  It is not just about numbers and outcomes.

Sandel’s theme is that there are three main ways to think about justice: maximizing welfare, respecting freedom, and promoting virtue.

I began to cast the proposals to Dodge in these terms and realize our social investments of limited resources require us to reflect on these matters.  How shall we compare a local arts group with a local soup kitchen, for example? Do we support the educational organization that brings freedom of choice and opportunity to a small number of underserved students in a dramatic, transformational way?  Or do we back efforts to incrementally improve an educational system that affects thousands of students?

Sandel unpacks that last idea: the utilitarian idea of “the greatest good for the greatest number” – both its strengths and its weaknesses. That chapter helps me understand why at some gatherings of foundations, there are strong pleas for the whole field to drop everything except a focus on mitigating climate change.

At Dodge, we use the themes Creativity and Sustainability as if they were virtues.  But I imagine Sandel countering: “Do you value the creativity it takes to create a new weapon?  Is everything worth sustaining?”

Clearly not.  I appreciate how Sandel frames the process of responsible moral judgment as “a dialectic between our judgments about particular situations and the principals we affirm on reflection.”  It reminds me again of the importance of “Quadrant II” time in organizations – that precious time we set aside and protect for important matters that are not urgent.  It is our time to reflect on lessons learned from action and guiding principles for future decisions.

It is both disconcerting and liberating to understand anew through reading Justice that the right thing to do is not always clear to a single individual, let alone a group, no matter how much thoughtful attention you pay to a given situation or choice.  But as he writes, “Thinking about justice seems inescapably to engage us in thinking about the best way to live,” and for us at Dodge, that takes us to the heart of our mission of fostering a more livable world.

We will never, in Sandel’s words, “resolve (our) disagreements once and for all.”  But these discussions “can give shape to the arguments we have, and bring moral clarity to the alternatives we confront.”

Another cycle of grantmaking is underway.

Thinking About the New Guidelines

Monday, November 9th, 2009

David Grant, President and CEO

Every morning, on my way to my e-mails or the news, I pause over the Dodge homepage. This Sunday, November 8th, I did more than pause, for there, finally, were the revised guidelines and all the accompanying materials people need to apply to Dodge for grants in 2010. We’ve been working on them for months.

It doesn’t take four or five months to write seven or eight pages and redesign some forms. But it could take forever to decide what’s in them, such is the freedom foundations have to choose among worthy ideas and efforts to support.

At this point in time, I hope we have found that sweet spot where change is so based on current practices and opportunities that it feels logical and right. These guidelines reflect what we have learned from our grantees, and I believe almost all of those organizations will find themselves in this new presentation of what Dodge supports.

At the same time, the new guidelines encourage big-picture thinking, which is different from our supporting discrete programs in different disciplines. They reflect a long-term vision of New Jersey as a creative place and, as a result, a more sustainable place. And they are built around the importance of having well-run and well-governed nonprofit organizations serving that vision both alone and, increasingly, with others.

Thus you will notice some new language about “high-potential, innovative, collaborative programs and models.” What do we mean by this? We think of the Sustainable Jersey coalition of local governments, universities, state government, businesses and nonprofits now working so effectively to give people on the local level the tools they need to make their places more sustainable. We think of the work Young Audiences of New Jersey and the Foundation for Educational Administration is doing to launch a state-wide creativity initiative. We think of the work The Cloud Institute for Sustainability Education is doing to involve schools, school-systems and their communities in understanding the mind-sets necessary to create a sustainable future together.

And we believe there will be other important ideas and effective approaches that will come our way because of the new guideline language about creativity and sustainability. As we say elsewhere on this site, quoting playwright David Mamet, “We steer where we are looking.”

I hope somewhere out there my successor is looking — and liking what he or she sees.

Feeling “Blue” About Education Never Seemed So Hopeful

Monday, October 19th, 2009

Michelle Knapik, Program Director, Environment

ted_logo

You probably know about TED talks and their tagline “ideas worth spreading.” I got to spend Sunday afternoon at a live TEDx talk organized around the theme of “What is possible in School.”

The “x” factor in the TED community stands for an independently organized TED event, and here’s where the “blue” comes into play because this event was hosted by the Blue School, which was founded by . . . yes, you guessed it, the Blue Man Group. If you want to get a glimpse of how radical education transformation manifests in a school, the Blue School is a must on your learning journey.

Blue School LogoAs a Dodge representative who is trying to help the Foundation continuously weave together the threads of creativity and sustainability throughout its grantmaking, this day was a feast for the mind presented by pioneering Education gourmets whose backgrounds ran the gamut from brain scientists to sustainability movement builders, and from far reaching school designers to psychologists. As soon as the video link of the presentation is live, we will send you a “high alert” and invitation to listen-in.  For now, let me introduce the presenters – all of them “provocateurs” in their own right (see note on David Rock’s work) – and whet your appetite for this TEDxblue talk.

Part of the beauty of the TED is that the effort is building a community of thought leaders, which enables a talk organizer to pull “idea spreaders” from the TED archives. This day started with a replay of Sir Ken Robinson’s TED talk, “Do Schools Kill Creativity?

Sir Ken likens the current education practices to strip mining our children’s minds to extract a single commodity rather than educating for a world that understands and develops the richness of human capacity. He wonders how many children we are losing because we “educate them from the waist up . . . then the head up . . . and then to one side” of the brain. Sir Ken believes that we are educating the creative capacity out of our children. If we are trying, as Sir Ken asserts, to “educate children for a future we cannot grasp”, it seems that we are “ruthlessly squandering” an opportunity to ignite their inherent creative capacity to deal with and shape that future.

Imagine a discussion on “what is possible in schools” where Sir Ken is the appetizer! Chris Wink, representing the Blue School Founders, has done a lot of thinking about how we can more aggressively promote creativity in schools. If you have had the rich experience of seeing the Blue Man Group perform you might recognize the “six mindsets” that Chris believes we can more “deliberately explore” and “move through” to tap our creative juices. He explained them as three pairs of diametrically opposed mindsets:

  • Scientist v. Shaman (our rational selves versus our instinctual, primal, inner-world explorer)
  • Group member v. Trickster (our ability to be attuned to others and experience creative collaboration versus the impulse to push past the constraints of convention and stimulate new ways of seeing and being)
  • Hero v. the Innocent (our ability to hold our resolve, to resourcefully push through obstacles and focus on a goal (soon to be referred to as “grit”) versus our ability to enter an emotional, fully present place where we experience childlike vulnerability — how many of us in our adulthood are adept at going here?)

When the Blue Man Group is at the top of their game, they move through and express connections among these mindsets. So is it not possible to educate our children to experience and move through these mindsets so they too have a fully developed mind palate?

Ok, so you are riding the creative high with me now, but what enables people to move from great experiences to high achievement? We think about this at Dodge all the time. Experiential education, a main focus of our grantmaking, might help a child enter a mindset they have not fully explored, or tap creative expression, or turn on a passion (all incredibly valuable), but what is it that makes it stick. University of Pennsylvania researcher Angela Duckworth believes we need “true grit”  to become a high achiever. Angela talked about capacity (our talents) and industry (the path to unlocking the talents). She measures things like the “tendency not to abandon tasks in the face of obstacles” or when faced with “changeability.” Her studies of students who perform best in spelling bees revealed that it is not intelligence that is the highest predictor of success, rather it is those who become “deliberate in practice.” This means that they “isolate what they don’t know, focus in and improve in these areas,” which, by the way, requires a willingness to operate – and persevere – outside one’s comfort zone. True grit.

Educate for creativity, check. Support the development of true grit, check.

YourBrainatWorkCover-784354-760192 But can you clear the hurdle of how we’ve hardwired our children’s brain to do almost the opposite of this? Brain scientist David Rock knows we can, but he asserts that it requires a “novel intrusion” to inspire such change – enter the role of the “provocateur.” The Blue School is integrating the provocateur into the classroom and curriculum. As David Rock explained, the provocateur “notices subtle signals, is ok with uncertainty and knows how to create change.” In essence, these are quiet leaders and change agents. Hmmm, what would happen in classrooms across the country if class aide positions were transformed to class provocateur positions? If you need more convincing on the brain science, pick up a hot off the press copy of David Rock’s book “Your Brain at Work

So we can rewire the brain to inspire a generation of creative thinkers and actors, but how do we address the “better world” challenge? As Jaimie Cloud, founder and president of the Cloud Institute for Sustainability Education says, “We wouldn’t need to educate for sustainability if there was no such thing as unsustainable.” As Jaimie notes, we “spend” 20% more natural capital than humans or nature put back into this earth, which “undermines the systems on which we depend” – and that’s unsustainable.

You may know that the Cloud Institute is a long time Dodge grantee and that Jamie’s work has the Foundation focused in on “systems thinkers” who can “gain new knowledge, apply insights and shift paradigms toward a sustainable future.”

Cloud’s curriculum gets at multiple, interconnected and integrated systems for sustainability learning. I’ll run through them here, but you really need to dive deep to understand their transformative power.

cloud-diagram_2

With that caveat, let’s go – we can educate in a way that children understand how to read feedback (this is the fuel for re-wiring the brain circuits) and get new results; we can teach kids that there are limits in a healthy system and that they can tap the power of limits (usher in creative thinking); we can teach children to live by natural laws (why skip this critical lesson – we teach laws created for safety, ethics and the like, but as Jaimie says, we don’t give kids the “operating principles of the planet”); we can teach children that we are all responsible and interconnected, especially in terms of understanding and protecting the commons (and there is the neurobiology of “we” to back this up – see Dan Seigel’s work). In essence, life is not a zero sum game and we can transform education in a way that our children understand that a healthy and sustainable future is possible. How? In part, because INTENTION TRUMPS our hardwiring (did I mention that Jaimie is one of my heroes?).

Dodge is promoting Cloud’s work in a number of ways in New Jersey, including curriculum shifts at Unity Charter School and a train the trainers program called NJ Learns: Schools and Communities that Learn Together for a Sustainable Future. We are also helping Cloud link this work into the exciting Sustainable Jersey program.

Jaimie often talks about educating for sustainability as preparing us to “write a new narrative.” Sometimes, though, we need people to lead us through existing narratives we have yet to explore – and to understand how to listen and discover. That teed-up the archive of Benjamin Zander’s TED talk wherein the famous conductor presented ideas about “Classical music with shiny eyes

In 18 minutes, he makes classical music resonate with everyone. He moves from single note impulses to deceptive cadence and whole phrase impulse (it is not the same without the music). He is a conductor who understands his leadership makes other people powerful, that his work awakens possibilities, and that he succeeds when he looks out and sees shining eyes. I suspect that all the arts do this and can prepare us to write that new narrative of human interaction and experience, but our challenge, as Benjamin states, is to ask “who am I being that my players eyes are not shining?” He asserts that what we say (to our children – to each other) makes a difference.

How to start to put all these concepts together? Dr. Dan Siegel talked about an “integrated mindsight.” He would add three new Rs to the education system– Reflection, Relationship and Resilience – all based on the brain science that we have two main circuits in our brain: the physical (the traditional three Rs address this) and the world of the mind (the circuit that is undeveloped by current education – usher in the three new Rs). He talked about kindergarten being the last time in school where we focus on interpersonal relationships, and he noted that we spend the rest of our education shaping the mind through the traditional 3 Rs. By doing this, he asserts that we miss the opportunity to develop the circuitry that deals insight and empathy, and that helps us see the world as interconnected. He invoked Einstein’s quote about our “optical delusion of our separateness.” He stresses the brain as our social organ, one that school and our modern culture have imprisoned. He sees reflection as the “opportunity to see that relationships are our life’s blood.” Basically, we have a social emergency in that we are less capable of regulating our internal world because we can’t see what’s inside. We have no “mindsight” to see and shape the internal world and little “face to face interaction that enables us to track it.” It seems to me that we will have to turn to each other and resolve (with true grit) to develop some strong mindsight to turn education on its head so we can write that new narrative.

mindful-brain

I feel like the waiter who just described a menu of new tantalizing dishes with exotic ingredients, each one with its own allure that is swirling around in your head. I imagine you thinking, “what was that middle dish about grit,” or “can you tell me more about mindsets and mindsight?”, knowing full well you will need to listen to this TEDxblue talk over and over until you’ve fully tasted each dish and re-wired your own brain along the way. I’m guessing that notions of traditional school “reform” are looking a lot less attractive and that you are hungry for education transformation that will enable everyone to order from this menu –this will be our collective challenge.

Do you have examples of schools that are serving these items? Please share. Would you be interested in a large scale, multi-venue viewing of this TEDxblue talk in New Jersey – perhaps one that invites conversation and records community responses? I think Dodge might be able to play a role in something like this – let us know your thoughts.